Ethics on the movie the experiment

milgram and zimbardo ethical issues

Prior to the Stanford Prison Experiment, Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram had found in that ordinary people would readily follow instructions by subjecting others to apparently dangerous levels of electric shocks, at the calm and cordial request of an authority figure.

An End to the Experiment Zimbardo had intended that the experiment should run for a fortnight, but on the sixth day it was terminated.

Deindividuation simply psychology

Would you have terminated it earlier? Due to these experiments science has discovered many amazing medical 8 advances over the last century, however because clinical trials involve living human beings, 9 some of these scientifically rigorous trial designs are not the most ethical. Criticism and response[ edit ] There has been controversy over both the ethics and scientific rigor of the Stanford prison experiment since nearly the beginning, and it has never been successfully replicated. The effect was to break the solidarity among prisoners. Privileged prisoners also got to eat special food in the presence of the other prisoners who had temporarily lost the privilege of eating. There's no comparison group. The team selected the 24 applicants whose test results predicted they would be the most psychologically stable and healthy. Zimbardo and the guards disassembled the prison and moved it onto a different floor of the building. Situationism and moral responsibility Virtue ethics, of course, is hardly the most prevalent moral theory amongst philosophers or anyone else. When the prisoners were introduced to a priest, they referred to themselves by their prison number, rather than their first name. Tensions run high, prisoners attempt to escape and the psychologists running the show find themselves more deeply intertwined in the process than they had anticipated. It was something I was very familiar with: to take on another personality before you step out on the stage. Another strength of the study is that the harmful treatment of participant led to the formal recognition of ethical guidelines by the American Psychological Association.

Most of the guards were upset when the experiment was halted after only six days. Alternative methodologies were looked at which would cause less distress to the participants but at the same time give the desired information, but nothing suitable could be found.

A strength of the study is that it has altered the way US prisons are run. The prisoners soon adopted prisoner-like behavior too.

Is the stanford experiment based on a true story

And, philosophizing aside, given that we know how much our immediate environment affects benevolent behaviour, we should thinking about what kind of situations we want to create for the inhabitants of our society. The research had felt "real" to them. Some even asked him to get a lawyer to help get them out. How can Zimbardo and, by proxy, Maverick Entertainment express horror at the behavior of the "guards" when they were merely doing what Zimbardo and others, myself included, encouraged them to do at the outset or frankly established as ground rules? The teacher, being unable to see the student, would hear a prerecorded response from the student towards the shock. When asked about the guards, they described the usual three stereotypes that can be found in any prison: some guards were good, some were tough but fair, and some were cruel. The experiment, which subjected its participants to a simulated prison environment, sparked intense debate at the time with the disturbing questions it raised about human nature.

Professor and psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted this experiment through Stanford University. Some even asked him to get a lawyer to help get them out. Asserting Independence Because the first day passed without incident, the guards were surprised and totally unprepared for the rebellion which broke out on the morning of the second day.

zimbardo website
Rated 5/10 based on 12 review
Integrity Ethics Module 6 Exercises